Women’s Wisdom on Environmental Philosophy

Women have played pivotal yet often underrecognized roles in shaping environmental philosophy from its inception through contemporary discourse. From Ellen Swallow Richards’ pioneering work in human ecology in the 1890s to Robin Wall Kimmerer’s integration of indigenous wisdom with scientific knowledge, women have consistently advanced holistic, interconnected approaches to understanding human-nature relationships (1). This essay traces the evolution of women’s environmental thought through early pioneers, the transformative impact of Rachel Carson, the development of ecofeminist philosophy, and contemporary multispecies and decolonial approaches.

Foundations: Early Pioneers in Environmental Thought (1870-1930)

The late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries witnessed groundbreaking contributions from women who laid crucial foundations for environmental philosophy. Ellen Swallow Richards (1842-1911), the first woman admitted to MIT and the first American woman to obtain a chemistry degree, introduced revolutionary concepts that bridged science and environmental consciousness (2). In her landmark 1892 speech, Richards introduced the term “oekology” to English, defining it as the “science of [our] normal lives” and establishing the foundation for what would become human ecology (3). Her vision emphasized that “the quality of life depends on the ability of society to teach its members how to live in harmony with their environment—defined first as the family, then with the community, then with the world and its resources” (4).

Richards’ scientific contributions were equally significant. She conducted the first comprehensive water pollution study in the United States, testing over 20,000 sites across Massachusetts, which led to the nation’s first state water-quality standards and informed the first Pure Food and Drug Act in Massachusetts (5). Her concept of euthenics, defined as “the betterment of living conditions, through conscious endeavor, for the purpose of securing efficient human beings,” represented an early articulation of environmental determinism’s positive potential (6).

The women’s club movement of 1900-1916 transformed conservation from “an elite male enterprise into a widely based movement,” as documented by Carolyn Merchant’s comprehensive study (7). The General Federation of Women’s Clubs, with 5,000 affiliated clubs by 1906, established forestry committees in every state and led successful campaigns for forest preservation (8). Mrs. Lovell White of the California Federation spearheaded a nine-year campaign to save the Calaveras Big Trees, collecting 1.5 million signatures and achieving the first special presidential message to Congress “at the request of an organization managed by women” (9).

Rachel Carson and the Birth of Modern Environmentalism

Rachel Carson (1907-1964) fundamentally transformed environmental philosophy through her integration of scientific rigor with literary eloquence and ethical reflection. Her masterwork Silent Spring (1962) introduced crucial concepts that reshaped public understanding of human-nature relationships. Carson argued that “Man is a part of nature, and his war against nature is inevitably a war against himself,” establishing interconnectedness as a foundational principle of environmental thought (10). Her critique of the “control of nature” mentality, which she characterized as “a phrase conceived in arrogance, born of the Neanderthal age of biology and philosophy,” challenged anthropocentric assumptions about human dominance over nature (11).

Carson’s environmental philosophy, as analyzed by Philip Cafaro, rests on three foundational premises: human health considerations, the moral considerability of non-human beings, and the value to humans of preserving wild nature (12). Her work anticipated the precautionary principle, arguing that “We have allowed these chemicals to be used with little or no advance investigation of their effect on soil, water, wildlife, and man himself” (13). The impact of Silent Spring was immediate and profound, selling over 100,000 copies in its first week and remaining in print in 28 languages (14).

Carson’s influence extended far beyond public awareness to concrete policy changes. The Environmental Protection Agency’s creation in 1970 has been described as “the extended shadow of Silent Spring” (15). The 1972 DDT ban and the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act, called Silent Spring‘s “greatest legal vindication,(16). Recent ecofeminist scholarship identifies Carson as a precursor to ecofeminism, noting how she faced gendered criticism questioning why “a spinster with no children was so concerned about genetics” while her emphasis on compassion and caring for non-human life aligned with what would become core ecofeminist values Wikipedia (17).

The Development of Ecofeminist Philosophy

The 1970s through 1990s witnessed the emergence of sophisticated ecofeminist philosophical frameworks that explicitly connected the oppression of women with the domination of nature. Vandana Shiva, often called the “Gandhi of grain,” developed the concept of “maldevelopment” to describe how Western development models simultaneously marginalize women and destroy biodiversity (18). Her assertion that “the marginalization of women and the destruction of biodiversity go hand in hand” became a central tenet of ecofeminist analysis (19). Shiva’s critique of “monocultures of the mind” challenged reductionist thinking that reduces complex ecological and social systems to single variables, paralleling industrial agriculture’s destructive monocultures (20).

Val Plumwood (1939-2008) provided rigorous philosophical analysis of Western dualistic thinking through her concept of “hyperseparation,” describing the structure of dominance driving nature/culture, female/male, and mind/body dualisms (21). Her critique of rationalism in Feminism and the Mastery of Nature (1993) argued that rationalist philosophy enables the connected oppressions of women and nature in Western thought (22). Plumwood’s development of the “relational self” offered an alternative to both deep ecology’s merged self and the Cartesian separated self, recognizing necessary continuities and divisions between self and environment (23).

Carolyn Merchant‘s groundbreaking The Death of Nature (1980) provided historical analysis demonstrating how the Scientific Revolution transformed nature from a living organism to a machine, enabling both environmental exploitation and women’s oppression (24). Her examination of the shift from organic to mechanistic worldviews revealed how changing metaphors for nature facilitated new forms of domination, while her proposal for “partnership ethics” offered an alternative framework emphasizing reciprocal relationships between humans and nature (25).

Karen J. Warren (1947-2020) systematized ecofeminist philosophy through her analysis of the “logic of domination” characterizing oppressive conceptual frameworks through hierarchical thinking and power-over conceptions (26). Her foundational essay “The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism” argued that feminism must expand to include ecological concerns while environmental ethics must address gender oppression (27). Warren’s observation that “Women are described in animal terms as pets, cows, sows, foxes, chicks, serpents, bitches, beavers… The exploitation of nature and animals is justified by feminizing them; the exploitation of women is justified by naturalizing them” revealed linguistic connections between forms of oppression (28).

Contemporary Developments: Multispecies and Decolonial Approaches

Contemporary women environmental philosophers are advancing beyond earlier frameworks through multispecies, decolonial, and indigenous approaches. Robin Wall Kimmerer, a botanist and member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, integrates Western science with traditional ecological knowledge in groundbreaking ways. Her concept of “reciprocity and the gift economy” emphasizes that “the awakening of a wider ecological consciousness requires the acknowledgment and celebration of our reciprocal relationship with the rest of the living world” (29). Kimmerer’s “grammar of animacy” recognizes plants and animals as “our oldest teachers,” challenging Western linguistic structures that objectify nature (30). Her work on “restorative reciprocity” moves beyond critique to practical approaches for giving back to the land (31).

Donna Haraway‘s concept of “multispecies entanglements” reconceptualizes environmental relationships, arguing that “the world is a knot in motion” of complex relationships between humans and nonhumans (32). Her notion of “staying with the trouble” advocates learning to live in damaged landscapes without turning away, while “making kin, not babies” proposes new forms of kinship beyond biological reproduction (33). Haraway’s work on “companion species” and “response-ability” has influenced urban planning theory, with scholars arguing planners should “make kin, not cities” to address environmental justice in multispecies worlds (34).

Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing‘s anthropological approach examines “collaboration without design” – how diverse organisms create livable worlds together without central planning (35). Her analysis of “salvage accumulation” reveals economic processes emerging from environmental destruction, while her concept of “assemblages” describes multi-species gatherings creating new possibilities for life (36). Tsing’s coinage of “Plantationocene” (with Haraway) offers an alternative to the Anthropocene that emphasizes colonial plantation systems’ role in environmental destruction (37).

Environmental Justice and Intersectional Approaches

Contemporary scholarship increasingly emphasizes intersectional approaches examining how race, class, gender, and colonialism intersect with environmental issues. The concept of “critical climate justice” examines multiple, concurrent oppressions in environmental contexts (38). Feminist political ecology (FPE) analyzes how gender, power, and environmental issues intersect, particularly in developing country contexts and under neoliberal policy frameworks (39).

Women environmental philosophers have consistently centered environmental justice concerns. Vandana Shiva’s work focuses on the disproportionate impacts of environmental degradation on women in the Global South, advocating for indigenous knowledge systems (40). Contemporary scholars are decolonizing environmental philosophy by moving beyond Western-centric approaches and recognizing sophisticated traditional ecological systems (41). The development of care-based environmental ethics and attention to environmental racism addresses disproportionate environmental burdens on marginalized communities (42).

Methodological Innovations and Future Directions

Women’s contributions to environmental philosophy extend beyond content to methodological innovations. The integration of personal narrative with philosophical analysis, exemplified by Val Plumwood’s crocodile attack reflections and Robin Wall Kimmerer’s botanical storytelling, demonstrates embodied approaches to environmental knowledge (43). The emphasis on situated knowledges, developed by Donna Haraway, recognizes that all knowledge emerges from particular perspectives and locations (44).

Contemporary developments point toward increasingly sophisticated analyses of environmental challenges. Multispecies justice frameworks incorporate nonhuman animals and plants into justice considerations (45). Feminist approaches to the Anthropocene critique masculinist narratives of environmental crisis while developing alternative conceptualizations (46). The recognition of indigenous environmental knowledge as sophisticated philosophical systems rather than mere “traditional practices” represents a crucial decolonial turn (47).

Conclusion

Women’s contributions to environmental philosophy demonstrate consistent patterns of innovation, integration, and transformation. From Ellen Swallow Richards’ pioneering human ecology to contemporary multispecies approaches, women environmental philosophers have challenged reductionist thinking, emphasized interconnection and reciprocity, and integrated emotional and embodied knowledge with rigorous analysis. Their work reveals that effective environmental philosophy requires not only understanding ecological systems but also examining the conceptual frameworks, power structures, and cultural narratives shaping human-nature relationships.

The evolution from early conservation activism through ecofeminist philosophy to contemporary decolonial and multispecies approaches shows increasing sophistication in analyzing environmental challenges. Women environmental philosophers have consistently expanded the boundaries of the field, incorporating insights from indigenous knowledge, feminist theory, and social justice movements. Their contributions demonstrate that environmental philosophy cannot be separated from questions of gender, race, class, and colonialism – that addressing environmental crises requires transforming the systems of domination affecting both human and more-than-human worlds.

As environmental challenges intensify, the holistic, intersectional, and care-based approaches developed by women environmental philosophers become increasingly vital. Their emphasis on reciprocity rather than domination, collaboration rather than control, and justice rather than mere sustainability offers essential resources for reimagining human-nature relationships in an era of environmental crisis. The continued development of these approaches – through indigenous knowledge integration, multispecies ethics, and decolonial methodologies – points toward more just and sustainable futures grounded in the recognition of our fundamental interconnection with the living world.

Bibliography

1. Dyball, Robert. “Ellen Swallow Richards: Mother of Human Ecology?” Human Ecology Review, vol. 24, no. 2, 2017, pp. 123-142.
2. McGregor, Sue L.T. “Home Ecology to Home Economics and Beyond: Ellen Swallow Richards’ Disciplinary Contributions.” Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, vol. 112, no. 2, 2020, pp. 25-37.
3. Richards, Ellen Swallow. “Oekology.” Speech at Vendome Hotel, Boston, 30 November 1892. MIT Institute Archives, MC 305.
4. Richards, Ellen Swallow. Euthenics, the Science of Controllable Environment: A Plea for Better Living Conditions as a First Step Toward Higher Human Efficiency. Whitcomb & Barrows, 1910.
5. Ellen Swallow Richards Collection. MIT Institute Archives, MC 305. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
6. Richards, Ellen Swallow. Euthenics, p. 136.
7. Merchant, Carolyn. “Women of the Progressive Conservation Movement: 1900-1916.” Environmental Review: ER, vol. 8, no. 1, 1984, pp. 57-85.
8. General Federation of Women’s Clubs. Annual Reports, 1900-1916. GFWC Archives, Washington, D.C.
9. Merchant, “Women of the Progressive Conservation Movement,” p. 72.
10. Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin, 1962, p. 169.
11. Carson, Silent Spring, p. 261.
12. Cafaro, Philip. “Rachel Carson’s Environmental Ethics.” Online Ethics, National Academy of Engineering, 2011.
13. Carson, Silent Spring, p. 188.
14. Lear, Linda J. Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature. Henry Holt, 1997, pp. 428-429.
15. Environmental Protection Agency. “DDT – A Brief History and Status.” EPA Archives, 2017.
16. Pimentel, David. “Silent Spring, the 50th anniversary of Rachel Carson’s book.” BMC Ecology, vol. 12, no. 20, 2012.
17. Barthold, Caoimhe. “Ecofeminist Political Advocacy: Three Contemporary Positions.” Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 29, no. 2, 2022, pp. 485-502.
18. Shiva, Vandana. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. Zed Press, 1988.
19. Shiva, Vandana, and Maria Mies. Ecofeminism. 2nd ed., Zed Books, 2014, p. 164.
20. Shiva, Vandana. Monocultures of the Mind: Biodiversity, Biotechnology and Agriculture. Zed Press, 1993.
21. Plumwood, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge, 1993.
22. Plumwood, Val. “Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism.” Hypatia, vol. 6, no. 1, 1991, pp. 3-27.
23. Plumwood, Val. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Routledge, 2002.
24. Merchant, Carolyn. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. Harper & Row, 1980.
25. Merchant, Carolyn. “Partnership Ethics.” Environmental Ethics, vol. 28, no. 4, 2006, pp. 337-350.
26. Warren, Karen J. Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western Perspective on What It Is and Why It Matters. Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
27. Warren, Karen J. “The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism.” Environmental Ethics, vol. 12, 1990, pp. 125-146.
28. Warren, “The Power and the Promise,” p. 135.
29. Kimmerer, Robin Wall. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Milkweed Editions, 2013, p. 190.
30. Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, p. 55.
31. Kimmerer, Robin Wall. The Serviceberry: Abundance and Reciprocity in the Natural World. Scribner, 2022.
32. Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, 2016, p. 32.
33. Haraway, Staying with the Trouble, pp. 102-103.
34. Houston, Donna, et al. “Make Kin, Not Cities! Multispecies Entanglements and ‘Becoming-World’ in Planning Theory.” Planning Theory, vol. 17, no. 2, 2018, pp. 190-212.
35. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press, 2015.
36. Tsing, The Mushroom at the End of the World, pp. 22-23.
37. Haraway, Donna, et al. “Anthropologists Are Talking – About the Anthropocene.” Ethnos, vol. 81, no. 3, 2016, pp. 535-564.
38. Sultana, Farhana. “Critical Climate Justice.” The Geographical Journal, vol. 188, no. 1, 2022, pp. 118-124.
39. Rocheleau, Dianne, et al., editors. Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. Routledge, 1996.
40. Shiva, Vandana. Seed Sovereignty, Food Security: Women in the Vanguard of the Fight against GMOs and Corporate Agriculture. North Atlantic Books, 2016.
41. Whyte, Kyle Powys. “Indigenous Science (Fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral Dystopias and Fantasies of Climate Change Crises.” Environment and Planning E, vol. 1, no. 1-2, 2018, pp. 224-242.
42. Pellow, David N. What Is Critical Environmental Justice? Polity Press, 2017.
43. Plumwood, Val. The Eye of the Crocodile. ANU Press, 2012.
44. Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, 1988, pp. 575-599.
45. Celermajer, Danielle, et al. “Multispecies Justice: Theories, Challenges, and a Research Agenda for Environmental Politics.” Environmental Politics, vol. 30, no. 1-2, 2021, pp. 119-140.
46. Haraway, Donna. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities, vol. 6, 2015, pp. 159-165.
47. Kimmerer, Robin Wall. “Restoration and Reciprocity: The Contributions of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.” Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration, edited by Dave Egan et al., Island Press, 2011, pp. 257-276.