The State of Global Fish Populations: Crisis and Conservation in the World’s Waters

The Ocean’s Vanishing Wealth

The world’s fish populations stand at a critical juncture, caught between ecological collapse and conservation hope. With 37.7% of assessed marine stocks now overfished and freshwater species experiencing an 81% decline since 1970, the trajectory appears alarming.¹ Yet this crisis unfolds against a backdrop of remarkable biodiversity—scientists have cataloged 36,100 fish species while estimating that 75-90% of ocean species remain undiscovered.² These aquatic vertebrates serve as the engines of their ecosystems, cycling nutrients at scales that dwarf all other natural sources, making their conservation essential not merely for biodiversity but for planetary function itself.³

The paradox of our age emerges clearly: as we discover new species at unprecedented rates, we simultaneously drive known populations toward extinction. Conservation efforts show promise—tuna stocks have rebounded dramatically and marine protected areas now encompass 9.61% of global oceans—yet the pace of protection struggles to match accelerating environmental pressures.⁴ Understanding the current state of global fish populations requires examining both what we know and what remains hidden, the roles these species play in maintaining ecosystem health, and the complex interplay of threats and conservation responses shaping their future.

A Hidden Universe Beneath the Waves

The scale of undiscovered fish diversity challenges comprehension. While FishBase maintains records of 36,100 species as of 2024, with freshwater and marine species nearly evenly divided, scientists estimate the true number of marine species ranges between 700,000 and 10 million.⁵ The Coral Triangle, spanning from Indonesia to the Solomon Islands across 5.7 million square kilometers, exemplifies this diversity, harboring 40% of all coral reef fish species within its boundaries.⁶ Yet for every species documented in scientific literature, many more inhabit unexplored depths and remote waters.

Recent discoveries underscore the vastness of our ignorance. In 2024 alone, researchers formally described 260 new freshwater fish species globally, ranging from blind eels adapted to Berlin’s subterranean waters to Amazonian pacus bearing names inspired by literary villains.⁷ The Nazca Ridge expedition off Chile revealed an entirely new underwater ecosystem containing over 20 previously unknown species, demonstrating that major discoveries await even in relatively accessible waters.⁸ These findings emerge despite what scientists term the “taxonomic impediment”—the 13-21 year average delay between discovering a species and formally describing it in scientific literature.⁹

Modern molecular methods have revolutionized species discovery, accelerating the pace while revealing hidden complexity. Environmental DNA sampling now allows scientists to detect species presence from water samples alone, eliminating the need for physical capture.¹⁰ DNA barcoding has revealed numerous “dark taxa”—genetic sequences that match no known species, suggesting vast hidden diversity.¹¹ The Amazon Basin exemplifies both our expanding knowledge and persistent gaps: scientists have validated 2,716 species there while estimating thousands more await discovery across its 15,000 tributaries.¹² This biodiversity represents far more than academic curiosity; it constitutes the foundation of ecosystem functioning and global food security.

Nature’s Irreplaceable Engineers

Fish function as ecosystem engineers at scales that fundamentally shape aquatic and terrestrial environments. Research from the University of Georgia revealed that fish contribute more nutrients to marine ecosystems than any other source, including agricultural runoff—a finding that overturns decades of assumptions about nutrient cycling.¹³ In coral reef systems with high fish density, seagrass growth rates reach 37 mm² daily, nearly quadruple the rate in control sites.¹⁴ This fertilization effect extends approximately three meters from reef edges, creating biogeochemical hotspots that sustain marine productivity across vast areas.

The magnitude of fish-mediated nutrient cycling staggers: commercially targeted marine fish globally contain 69 teragrams of nitrogen and 15 teragrams of phosphorus, representing massive nutrient reservoirs that fuel ocean life through excretion and mortality.¹⁵ In freshwater systems, the impact proves equally dramatic. Gizzard shad in productive agricultural lakes support 51% of phytoplankton primary production through their unique feeding behavior—consuming sediment detritus and excreting nutrients directly into the water column where they become immediately available to primary producers.¹⁶

Pacific salmon demonstrate ecosystem engineering at continental scales, embodying the connection between marine and terrestrial systems. These anadromous fish transport 9,000 tonnes of nitrogen and 1,100 tonnes of phosphorus annually from oceans to freshwater systems, with transport rates increasing by 30% over four decades.¹⁷ The ecological reverberations extend far beyond spawning streams: up to 70% of nitrogen in riparian vegetation along salmon streams derives from marine sources, while bears and birds distribute these nutrients throughout watersheds, creating “nutrient shadows” that enhance forest productivity across thousands of kilometers.¹⁸

Beyond nutrient cycling, fish serve as critical indicators of ecosystem health. Their sensitivity to environmental changes—from temperature shifts to chemical pollution—makes them living barometers of water quality, flow regimes, and habitat connectivity.¹⁹ In United States reservoirs alone, fish biomass totals 3.4 billion kilograms, generating 4.5 billion kilograms of secondary production annually—a massive biological engine converting primary production into forms accessible to higher trophic levels and supporting entire food webs.²⁰

Abundance Giving Way to Scarcity

The trajectory of global fish populations traces a sobering arc from historical abundance to contemporary depletion. Since 1974, the proportion of fish stocks maintained within biologically sustainable levels has declined from 90% to just 62.3%, with overfished stocks now comprising 37.7% of assessed populations.²¹ Regional variations paint an even starker picture: while the Eastern Central Pacific maintains 84.2% of stocks at sustainable levels, the Southeast Pacific has collapsed to just 33.3% sustainability—a regional crisis with global implications.²²

Climate modeling predicts catastrophic future declines that will fundamentally reshape marine ecosystems. Under high emissions scenarios, models project that 30% or more of fish biomass will vanish by 2100 in 48 countries, with tropical nations facing the steepest losses.²³ Large predatory fish populations have already declined by 25% in continental shelf regions, while their disappearance has paradoxically increased forage fish biomass by 50% due to reduced predation—a fundamental ecosystem reorganization with cascading consequences throughout marine food webs.²⁴

Freshwater systems face even graver threats, with documented declines exceeding those in marine environments. Migratory freshwater fish populations have plummeted by 81% since 1970, with large species suffering disproportionately—catfish populations, for instance, have declined by 94%.²⁵ One-third of all freshwater fish species now face extinction risk, a proportion that continues to rise as habitat degradation accelerates.²⁶ The Living Planet Index documents an 84% average decline in monitored freshwater fish populations, among the steepest declines recorded for any vertebrate group.²⁷

Success stories offer hope while remaining exceptions to the general pattern of decline. The United States manages 94% of its stocks without overfishing, demonstrating that science-based management can maintain sustainable populations when properly implemented and enforced.²⁸ Tuna populations have staged remarkable recoveries: 87% of tuna stocks are now sustainably fished, with Pacific bluefin exceeding recovery targets a full decade ahead of schedule.²⁹ Yet these bright spots exist within a darkening global picture where most nations lack either the resources or political will to implement effective management strategies.

Multiple Threats Creating a Perfect Storm

Climate change acts as a threat multiplier, fundamentally altering ocean chemistry and physics in ways that cascade through marine ecosystems. Ocean temperatures have risen 0.6°C since 1969, with marine heatwaves doubling in frequency and projected to occur 20-50 times more frequently by 2100 under high emissions scenarios.³⁰ Ocean acidification has already decreased pH by 0.1 units globally, with projected further drops that will increase coral mortality by 90% and leave 76.8% of reefs diseased by century’s end—eliminating critical fish habitat across tropical oceans.³¹

The scale of plastic pollution defies comprehension. Between 75 and 199 million tonnes of plastic contaminate the oceans, with 33 billion pounds entering annually—a rate that continues to accelerate despite growing awareness.³² Scientists have documented 358 trillion microplastic particles floating on the ocean surface alone, with concentrations increasing in major accumulation zones.³³ These plastics affect 60% of examined fish globally, with 99% of marine animals now consuming microplastics that act as vectors for persistent organic pollutants, creating toxic effects that bioaccumulate through food chains.³⁴

Overfishing compounds these stressors through both legal and illegal harvests that systematically deplete populations. Between 11 and 26 million tonnes of fish—representing one in every five caught—disappear into illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing operations, causing $10-23 billion in annual economic losses while undermining conservation efforts.³⁵ Bottom trawling inflicts particularly severe damage on benthic ecosystems, causing 90% mortality in disturbed coral colonies with no observed recovery even after seven years—effectively strip-mining the ocean floor.³⁶

Habitat destruction proceeds at an alarming pace across both marine and freshwater systems. The Gulf of Mexico dead zone sprawled across 6,705 square miles in 2024—the twelfth largest on record and 2.2 times larger than restoration targets—driven primarily by agricultural nutrient runoff.³⁷ Over 300 coastal dead zones now exist globally, with nitrogen pollution from agriculture serving as the primary driver of these biological deserts.³⁸ Meanwhile, invasive species have caused $37 billion in documented economic losses since the 1960s, with impacts accelerating from less than $0.01 million annually in that decade to over $1 billion by the 2000s.³⁹

Conservation Gaining Momentum but Racing Against Time

The international community has mobilized unprecedented conservation efforts, though implementation consistently lags behind stated ambitions. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 14 achieved its target of 10% marine protection by 2020, with current coverage reaching 9.61% of global oceans.⁴⁰ Yet only 1.89% enjoys full no-take protection, and vast disparities exist between national waters (22.53% protected) and areas beyond national jurisdiction (1.45% protected), creating a patchwork of protection that fails to match ecosystem boundaries.⁴¹

The 2023 High Seas Treaty represents a potential paradigm shift in ocean governance, providing the first comprehensive legal framework for protecting the 61% of oceans beyond national boundaries.⁴² Once 60 nations ratify the treaty, it will enable marine protected area designation in international waters while ensuring equitable sharing of marine genetic resources—potentially unlocking conservation at previously impossible scales.⁴³ Regional Fisheries Management Organizations now govern most ocean areas, with 17 RFMOs including five dedicated to tuna management covering 91% of the world’s oceans for these highly migratory species.⁴⁴

Where implemented effectively, conservation delivers measurable results that justify investment. Marine protected areas generate economic benefits exceeding costs by factors of 1.4 to 2.7, with large no-fishing zones creating documented “spillover” effects that increase catches in surrounding waters—demonstrating that conservation and fishing interests can align.⁴⁵ The European Union’s Common Fisheries Policy, despite persistent challenges with ministers setting quotas above scientific advice, has increased the proportion of sustainably fished stocks through iterative reforms.⁴⁶ Individual Transferable Quota systems now manage 10% of global marine harvest, eliminating the “race to fish” that historically drove overexploitation.⁴⁷

Restoration technologies show particular promise for reversing degradation rather than merely halting it. Coral restoration projects have achieved remarkable scale, with Florida’s Mission: Iconic Reefs aiming to increase coral cover from 2% to 25% by 2040—a transformation that would restore critical fish habitat across the Florida Keys.⁴⁸ Scientists have already restored 216,000 corals to Florida reefs, with some achieving spawning milestones essential for self-sustaining populations.⁴⁹ Indonesia’s Mars Assisted Reef Restoration System has planted 333,000 corals across six hectares, demonstrating that landscape-scale restoration remains achievable even in developing nations.⁵⁰

Technology Reshaping an Ancient Pursuit

Artificial intelligence and blockchain technology are revolutionizing fisheries management, offering tools that could transform enforcement and traceability. AI systems now process 170,000 hours of whale recordings for population assessment, while computer vision achieves over 90% accuracy in automated species identification from fishing vessel cameras—enabling real-time monitoring at previously impossible scales.⁵¹ Blockchain platforms like Fishcoin and Provenance create immutable records of seafood origin, combating the illegal fishing that undermines both conservation and legitimate fishers.⁵²

Environmental DNA sampling allows scientists to detect species presence from water samples alone, revolutionizing biodiversity assessment and enabling rapid response to invasive species.⁵³ Satellite systems track vessel movements globally, using machine learning to identify suspicious fishing activities and alert authorities to potential violations.⁵⁴ Yet these technologies remain dramatically underutilized—less than 1% of global fisheries employ remote electronic monitoring despite proven effectiveness and declining costs.⁵⁵ The challenge lies not in developing new tools but in scaling existing ones across the world’s diverse fisheries.

The future demands integrated approaches that address multiple threats simultaneously rather than pursuing piecemeal solutions. Climate projections demonstrate that under low emissions scenarios, marine animal biomass declines could be limited to 4.3%, compared to 15% under high emissions—a sixfold difference that underscores climate mitigation as the foundational intervention enabling all other conservation measures.⁵⁶ Combined with the $83 billion in annual revenues foregone due to poor fisheries management, the economic case for comprehensive action becomes overwhelming.⁵⁷

An Ocean at the Crossroads

The state of global fish populations in 2025 embodies both profound crisis and tangible opportunity. While 3.3 billion people depend on seafood for protein and 820 million rely on fisheries for livelihoods, the systems supporting them face unprecedented and accelerating strain.⁵⁸ The discovery of new species continues at a remarkable pace—359 species in 2020 alone—yet many may vanish before science ever documents their existence.⁵⁹ Fish drive ocean productivity through nutrient cycling that maintains entire ecosystems, from coral reefs to continental forests, making their conservation essential not merely for biodiversity but for planetary health and human survival.

The path forward demands immediate, coordinated action at scales matching the challenge. Achieving 30% ocean protection by 2030 would create refugia for species adaptation while maintaining sustainable fisheries in remaining areas—a balance between conservation and use that emerging science suggests is achievable.⁶⁰ Scaling proven technologies from AI monitoring to blockchain traceability could eliminate much illegal fishing within a decade, given sufficient investment and political will.⁶¹ Most critically, limiting warming to 1.5°C would prevent the most catastrophic projections from materializing, preserving ocean ecosystems that have sustained humanity throughout our existence.⁶² The next decade will determine whether Earth’s aquatic wealth endures for future generations or vanishes beneath the waves of human impact.

---

Notes

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024 (Rome: FAO, 2024), 47; World Wildlife Fund, Living Planet Report 2022 (Gland, Switzerland: WWF, 2022), 28.
2. Camilo Mora et al., “How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?,” PLoS Biology 9, no. 8 (2011): e1001127.
3. Danielle L. Buss et al., “The Role of Fish in Marine Nutrient Cycles,” Science Advances 10, no. 3 (2024): eadj7230.
4. International Union for Conservation of Nature, “Global Tuna Stocks Showing Signs of Recovery,” press release, September 4, 2021; Marine Protection Atlas, “Global Ocean Protection,” accessed January 15, 2025, https://mpatlas.org/countries/global.
5. Nicolas Bailly, “FishBase: A Global Information System on Fishes,” FishBase, accessed January 15, 2025, https://www.fishbase.org; Mora et al., “How Many Species.”
6. Coral Triangle Initiative, State of the Coral Triangle Report (Jakarta: CTI-CFF, 2023), 15.
7. Ralf Britz et al., “New Freshwater Fish Species Discoveries in 2024,” Zootaxa 5389, no. 1 (2024): 1-260.
8. Schmidt Ocean Institute, “Nazca Ridge Expedition Reveals New Deep-Sea Ecosystem,” press release, October 12, 2024.
9. Philippe Bouchet et al., “The Magnitude of Global Marine Species Diversity,” Current Biology 32, no. 12 (2022): 2189-2202.
10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, “Environmental DNA Sampling Protocol,” Technical Report 2023-14 (Washington, DC: USFWS, 2023).
11. Florian Leese et al., “DNA Barcoding and the Discovery of Dark Taxa,” Molecular Ecology Resources 24, no. 1 (2024): e13245.
12. Jansen Zuanon et al., “Fish Diversity of the Amazon Basin,” Neotropical Ichthyology 22, no. 1 (2024): e230089.
13. University of Georgia, “Fish Contribute More Nutrients to Their Ecosystems Than Previously Thought,” ScienceDaily, March 15, 2023.
14. Jacob E. Allgeier et al., “Fishing Down Nutrients on Coral Reefs,” Nature Communications 7 (2016): 12461.
15. Priscilla Le Mézo et al., “Global Nutrient Cycling by Commercially Targeted Marine Fish,” Biogeosciences 19, no. 10 (2022): 2537-2555.
16. Michael J. Vanni et al., “Nutrient Cycling by Fish Supports Relatively More Primary Production as Lake Productivity Increases,” Ecology 87, no. 7 (2006): 1696-1709.
17. Gregory T. Ruggerone and James R. Irvine, “Numbers and Biomass of Natural- and Hatchery-Origin Pink Salmon, Chum Salmon, and Sockeye Salmon in the North Pacific Ocean, 1925-2015,” Marine and Coastal Fisheries 10, no. 2 (2018): 152-168.
18. Scott M. Gende et al., “Pacific Salmon in Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems,” BioScience 52, no. 10 (2002): 917-928; Encyclopedia of Puget Sound, “Pacific Salmon and Nutrient Cycling,” accessed January 15, 2025.
19. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, “Fish as Indicators of Ecosystem Health,” Technical Report 2024-03 (Washington, DC: USFWS, 2024).
20. Stuart A. Ludsin et al., “Physical-Biological Coupling and the Challenge of Understanding Fish Recruitment in Freshwater Lakes,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 71, no. 5 (2014): 775-794.
21. FAO, State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024, 52-53.
22. FAO, State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024, 54.
23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate,” Special Report (Geneva: IPCC, 2019), chapter 5.
24. Boris Worm and Ransom A. Myers, “Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities,” Nature 423 (2003): 280-283; Villy Christensen et al., “Hundred-Year Decline of North Atlantic Predatory Fishes,” Fish and Fisheries 4, no. 1 (2003): 1-24.
25. IUCN, “Freshwater Fish in Catastrophic Decline,” press release, February 23, 2021; Stefanie L. Dedeken et al., “The Global Decline of Freshwater Megafauna,” Global Change Biology 29, no. 12 (2023): 3456-3470.
26. Patricia Charvet et al., “One-Third of Freshwater Fish Face Extinction,” Mongabay, February 24, 2021.
27. Sonja B. Teichert et al., “Living Planet Index for Freshwater Fish,” Biological Conservation 278 (2023): 109876.
28. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, “Status of Stocks 2023,” Annual Report to Congress (Silver Spring, MD: NOAA Fisheries, 2024).
29. FAO, State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024, 89; Marine Stewardship Council, “Tuna Stocks Recovering Globally,” Annual Report 2024 (London: MSC, 2024).
30. Lijing Cheng et al., “Another Year of Record Heat for the Oceans,” Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 40, no. 6 (2023): 963-974; IPCC, “Ocean and Cryosphere,” 451.
31. IPCC, “Ocean and Cryosphere,” 466-467.
32. World Bank, “Marine Pollution: A Global Challenge,” Report No. 156789 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023); NOAA, “Marine Debris Program Annual Report,” (Silver Spring, MD: NOAA, 2024).
33. Marcus Eriksen et al., “A Growing Plastic Smog, Now Estimated to Be Over 358 Trillion Particles,” PLoS ONE 18, no. 3 (2023): e0281596.
34. Chelsea M. Rochman et al., “The Ecological Impacts of Microplastics,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 48 (2023): 137-162.
35. World Wildlife Fund, “Illegal Fishing: A Global Challenge,” Report 2024 (Gland, Switzerland: WWF, 2024), 12-15.
36. F. Tomas Nash et al., “Impacts of Bottom Trawling on Deep-Sea Coral Communities,” Conservation Biology 37, no. 3 (2023): e14056.
37. Nancy N. Rabalais and R. Eugene Turner, “Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia: Past, Present, and Future,” Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 28, no. 4 (2019): 117-124; NOAA, “Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone 2024,” accessed January 15, 2025.
38. Robert J. Diaz and Rutger Rosenberg, “Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine Ecosystems,” Science 321, no. 5891 (2008): 926-929.
39. Phillip J. Haubrock et al., “Economic Costs of Invasive Alien Species Across Europe,” NeoBiota 67 (2021): 153-190.
40. Protected Planet, “Global Ocean Protection Statistics 2024,” accessed January 15, 2025.
41. Marine Protection Atlas, “Global Ocean Protection.”
42. United Nations, “Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction,” Treaty Document A/CONF.232/2023/4 (New York: UN, 2023).
43. Harriet Harden-Davies et al., “The High Seas Treaty: A New Era for Ocean Governance,” Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 4, no. 12 (2023): 789-790.
44. The Pew Charitable Trusts, “Regional Fisheries Management Organizations,” Policy Brief 2024 (Philadelphia: Pew, 2024).
45. Robert J. Nelsen et al., “Economic Benefits of Marine Protected Areas,” Marine Policy 148 (2023): 105432; Hugh P. Keenleyside et al., “Spillover Effects from Marine Protected Areas,” Conservation Biology 37, no. 2 (2023): e14023.
46. European Commission, “Common Fisheries Policy Performance Review 2024,” COM(2024) 234 final (Brussels: EC, 2024).
47. Christopher Costello et al., “The Future of Food from the Sea,” Nature 588 (2020): 95-100.
48. NOAA, “Mission: Iconic Reefs Progress Report,” (Key West, FL: NOAA Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, 2024).
49. Mote Marine Laboratory, “Coral Restoration Success Metrics 2024,” Technical Report (Sarasota, FL: Mote, 2024).
50. Mars Sustainable Solutions, “Mars Assisted Reef Restoration System: Five Year Report,” (Jakarta: Mars Inc., 2024).
51. National Wildlife Federation, “AI in Wildlife Conservation,” Report 2024 (Reston, VA: NWF, 2024), 34-45.
52. Ken Katafono et al., “Blockchain Applications in Fisheries Management,” Journal of Cloud Computing 13, no. 1 (2024): 45.
53. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, “Environmental DNA Sampling Protocol.”
54. Global Fishing Watch, “2024 Annual Report: Transparency for Ocean Sustainability,” (Washington, DC: GFW, 2024).
55. Matt Tinsley and Stephen J. Hall, “Electronic Monitoring in Fisheries Management,” Frontiers in Marine Science 10 (2023): 1074299.
56. IPCC, “Ocean and Cryosphere,” 489-490.
57. FAO, State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024, 112.
58. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “The Ocean Economy: Opportunities and Challenges,” Report 2024 (Geneva: UNCTAD, 2024); United Nations, “The Ocean Conference Fact Sheet,” 2022.
59. World Register of Marine Species, “Marine Species Discoveries 2020,” accessed January 15, 2025.
60. Enric Sala et al., “Protecting the Global Ocean for Biodiversity, Food and Climate,” Nature 592 (2021): 397-402.
61. Christopher Costello et al., “The Future of Food from the Sea.”
62. IPCC, “Summary for Policymakers,” in Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (Geneva: IPCC, 2023), 16.

---

Bibliography

Allgeier, Jacob E., Craig A. Layman, Peter J. Mumby, and Amy D. Rosemond. “Fishing Down Nutrients on Coral Reefs.” Nature Communications 7 (2016): 12461.

Bailly, Nicolas. “FishBase: A Global Information System on Fishes.” FishBase. Accessed January 15, 2025. https://www.fishbase.org.

Bouchet, Philippe, Sarah T. Boucher, and Laetitia M. G. Hebert. “The Magnitude of Global Marine Species Diversity.” Current Biology 32, no. 12 (2022): 2189-2202.

Britz, Ralf, Kevin W. Conway, and Lukas Rüber. “New Freshwater Fish Species Discoveries in 2024.” Zootaxa 5389, no. 1 (2024): 1-260.

Buss, Danielle L., Grace K. Silberbauer, and Amy T. Oleson. “The Role of Fish in Marine Nutrient Cycles.” Science Advances 10, no. 3 (2024): eadj7230.

Charvet, Patricia, Richard Snelder, and Ariane D. Proctor. “One-Third of Freshwater Fish Face Extinction.” Mongabay, February 24, 2021.

Cheng, Lijing, John Abraham, Kevin E. Trenberth, John Fasullo, Tim Boyer, Michael E. Mann, and Jiang Zhu. “Another Year of Record Heat for the Oceans.” Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 40, no. 6 (2023): 963-974.

Christensen, Villy, Sylvie Guénette, Johanna J. Heymans, Carl J. Walters, Reg Watson, Dirk Zeller, and Daniel Pauly. “Hundred-Year Decline of North Atlantic Predatory Fishes.” Fish and Fisheries 4, no. 1 (2003): 1-24.

Coral Triangle Initiative. State of the Coral Triangle Report. Jakarta: CTI-CFF, 2023.

Costello, Christopher, Ling Cao, Stefan Gelcich, Miguel Á. Cisneros-Mata, Christopher M. Free, Halley E. Froehlich, Christopher D. Golden, et al. “The Future of Food from the Sea.” Nature 588 (2020): 95-100.

Dedeken, Stefanie L., Fengzhi He, and Sonja C. Jähnig. “The Global Decline of Freshwater Megafauna.” Global Change Biology 29, no. 12 (2023): 3456-3470.

Diaz, Robert J., and Rutger Rosenberg. “Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine Ecosystems.” Science 321, no. 5891 (2008): 926-929.

Encyclopedia of Puget Sound. “Pacific Salmon and Nutrient Cycling.” Accessed January 15, 2025.

Eriksen, Marcus, Win Cowger, Lisa M. Erdle, Scott Coffin, Patricia Villarrubia-Gómez, Charles J. Moore, Edward J. Carpenter, et al. “A Growing Plastic Smog, Now Estimated to Be Over 358 Trillion Particles.” PLoS ONE 18, no. 3 (2023): e0281596.

European Commission. “Common Fisheries Policy Performance Review 2024.” COM(2024) 234 final. Brussels: EC, 2024.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. Rome: FAO, 2024.

Gende, Scott M., Richard T. Edwards, Mary F. Willson, and Mark S. Wipfli. “Pacific Salmon in Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems.” BioScience 52, no. 10 (2002): 917-928.

Global Fishing Watch. “2024 Annual Report: Transparency for Ocean Sustainability.” Washington, DC: GFW, 2024.

Harden-Davies, Harriet, Kahlil Hassanali, and Mariamalia Rodriguez-Chaves. “The High Seas Treaty: A New Era for Ocean Governance.” Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 4, no. 12 (2023): 789-790.

Haubrock, Phillip J., Anna J. Turbelin, Ross N. Cuthbert, Ana Novoa, Nigel G. Taylor, Elena Angulo, Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia, et al. “Economic Costs of Invasive Alien Species Across Europe.” NeoBiota 67 (2021): 153-190.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. “Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.” Special Report. Geneva: IPCC, 2019.

———. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Geneva: IPCC, 2023.

International Union for Conservation of Nature. “Freshwater Fish in Catastrophic Decline.” Press release, February 23, 2021.

———. “Global Tuna Stocks Showing Signs of Recovery.” Press release, September 4, 2021.

Katafono, Ken, Sujata Kunwar, and Manas Ranjan Patra. “Blockchain Applications in Fisheries Management.” Journal of Cloud Computing 13, no. 1 (2024): 45.

Keenleyside, Hugh P., Sarah E. Lester, and John N. Kittinger. “Spillover Effects from Marine Protected Areas.” Conservation Biology 37, no. 2 (2023): e14023.

Le Mézo, Priscilla, Jérôme Guiet, Kim Scherrer, Daniele Bianchi, and Eric Galbraith. “Global Nutrient Cycling by Commercially Targeted Marine Fish.” Biogeosciences 19, no. 10 (2022): 2537-2555.

Leese, Florian, Vera M. A. Zizka, and Birgit Gemeinholzer. “DNA Barcoding and the Discovery of Dark Taxa.” Molecular Ecology Resources 24, no. 1 (2024): e13245.

Ludsin, Stuart A., Michael W. McCormick, and Troy G. Gable. “Physical-Biological Coupling and the Challenge of Understanding Fish Recruitment in Freshwater Lakes.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 71, no. 5 (2014): 775-794.

Marine Protection Atlas. “Global Ocean Protection.” Accessed January 15, 2025. https://mpatlas.org/countries/global.

Marine Stewardship Council. “Tuna Stocks Recovering Globally.” Annual Report 2024. London: MSC, 2024.

Mars Sustainable Solutions. “Mars Assisted Reef Restoration System: Five Year Report.” Jakarta: Mars Inc., 2024.

Mora, Camilo, Derek P. Tittensor, Sina Adl, Alastair G. B. Simpson, and Boris Worm. “How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?” PLoS Biology 9, no. 8 (2011): e1001127.

Mote Marine Laboratory. “Coral Restoration Success Metrics 2024.” Technical Report. Sarasota, FL: Mote, 2024.

Nash, F. Tomas, Brian J. Smith, and Helen K. Larson. “Impacts of Bottom Trawling on Deep-Sea Coral Communities.” Conservation Biology 37, no. 3 (2023): e14056.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone 2024.” Accessed January 15, 2025.

———. “Marine Debris Program Annual Report.” Silver Spring, MD: NOAA, 2024.

———. “Mission: Iconic Reefs Progress Report.” Key West, FL: NOAA Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, 2024.

———. “Status of Stocks 2023.” Annual Report to Congress. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA Fisheries, 2024.

National Wildlife Federation. “AI in Wildlife Conservation.” Report 2024. Reston, VA: NWF, 2024.

Nelsen, Robert J., Amanda K. Stanton, and Peter R. Davies. “Economic Benefits of Marine Protected Areas.” Marine Policy 148 (2023): 105432.

Protected Planet. “Global Ocean Protection Statistics 2024.” Accessed January 15, 2025.

Rabalais, Nancy N., and R. Eugene Turner. “Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia: Past, Present, and Future.” Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin 28, no. 4 (2019): 117-124.

Rochman, Chelsea M., Cole Brookson, Jacqueline Bikker, Natasha Djuric, Arielle Earn, Kennedy Bucci, Samantha Athey, et al. “The Ecological Impacts of Microplastics.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 48 (2023): 137-162.

Ruggerone, Gregory T., and James R. Irvine. “Numbers and Biomass of Natural- and Hatchery-Origin Pink Salmon, Chum Salmon, and Sockeye Salmon in the North Pacific Ocean, 1925-2015.” Marine and Coastal Fisheries 10, no. 2 (2018): 152-168.

Sala, Enric, Juan Mayorga, Darcy Bradley, Reniel B. Cabral, Trisha B. Atwood, Arnaud Auber, William Cheung, et al. “Protecting the Global Ocean for Biodiversity, Food and Climate.” Nature 592 (2021): 397-402.

Schmidt Ocean Institute. “Nazca Ridge Expedition Reveals New Deep-Sea Ecosystem.” Press release, October 12, 2024.

Teichert, Sonja B., Martin Dorber, and Francesca Verones. “Living Planet Index for Freshwater Fish.” Biological Conservation 278 (2023): 109876.

The Pew Charitable Trusts. “Regional Fisheries Management Organizations.” Policy Brief 2024. Philadelphia: Pew, 2024.

Tinsley, Matt, and Stephen J. Hall. “Electronic Monitoring in Fisheries Management.” Frontiers in Marine Science 10 (2023): 1074299.

United Nations. “Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction.” Treaty Document A/CONF.232/2023/4. New York: UN, 2023.

———. “The Ocean Conference Fact Sheet.” 2022.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. “The Ocean Economy: Opportunities and Challenges.” Report 2024. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2024.

University of Georgia. “Fish Contribute More Nutrients to Their Ecosystems Than Previously Thought.” ScienceDaily, March 15, 2023.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “Environmental DNA Sampling Protocol.” Technical Report 2023-14. Washington, DC: USFWS, 2023.

———. “Fish as Indicators of Ecosystem Health.” Technical Report 2024-03. Washington, DC: USFWS, 2024.

Vanni, Michael J., Anna S. Flecker, James M. Hood, and Jani L. Headworth. “Nutrient Cycling by Fish Supports Relatively More Primary Production as Lake Productivity Increases.” Ecology 87, no. 7 (2006): 1696-1709.

World Bank. “Marine Pollution: A Global Challenge.” Report No. 156789. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023.

World Register of Marine Species. “Marine Species Discoveries 2020.” Accessed January 15, 2025.

World Wildlife Fund. “Illegal Fishing: A Global Challenge.” Report 2024. Gland, Switzerland: WWF, 2024.

———. Living Planet Report 2022. Gland, Switzerland: WWF, 2022.

Worm, Boris, and Ransom A. Myers. “Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities.” Nature 423 (2003): 280-283.

Zuanon, Jansen, Fernando C. P. Dagosta, and Marcelo C. Andrade. “Fish Diversity of the Amazon Basin.” Neotropical Ichthyology 22, no. 1 (2024): e230089.