Energy Power Sources of the Future

Listen to an insight into this article in our Deep Dive

Part I: The “White Gold” Rush: An Analysis of Geologic Hydrogen

The global energy transition is marked by a continuous search for novel, low-carbon energy sources that can complement the established pillars of solar, wind, and geothermal power. Among the most discussed and potentially disruptive entrants is geologic hydrogen, a naturally occurring resource that has ignited a modern-day “gold rush.” Often referred to as white, natural, or gold hydrogen, this energy source is found within the Earth’s crust, formed by ongoing geological processes rather than industrial manufacturing. This distinction is critical; unlike its manufactured counterparts—grey, blue, and green hydrogen, which are energy carriers requiring significant energy inputs for their production—white hydrogen is a primary energy source, offering the tantalizing prospect of clean energy extraction with a minimal carbon footprint and potentially revolutionary economics.

However, the excitement surrounding white hydrogen is tempered by profound uncertainties. The industry is nascent, with a landscape characterized by vast but speculative resource estimates, unproven extraction scalability, and significant geological unknowns. This section of the report provides a definitive, data-driven analysis of geologic hydrogen, moving from its fundamental science and global exploration hotspots to its complex economic realities and environmental scrutiny. It aims to equip investors, policymakers, and corporate strategists with a clear framework for evaluating the significant hype and separating it from the tangible, commercial reality of this emerging energy frontier.

1.1 The Promise and Premise of Natural Hydrogen: Geological Origins and Resource Potential

The foundation of the white hydrogen thesis lies in its genesis. It is molecular hydrogen (H2​) formed and trapped within the Earth’s subsurface through natural geochemical processes, distinguishing it fundamentally from industrially produced hydrogen.1, 2 Understanding these formation mechanisms is paramount, as they dictate where and how this resource can be found, a process that diverges significantly from traditional hydrocarbon exploration.

The most significant generation mechanism, believed to account for approximately 80% of the world’s natural hydrogen, is serpentinization.1 This is a geochemical reaction where water, often seawater, interacts with iron- and magnesium-rich (ultramafic) igneous rocks, such as olivine and pyroxene, at elevated temperatures and pressures.1, 3, 4 During this process, the water oxidizes the iron minerals (Fe2+ to Fe3+), releasing hydrogen gas as a byproduct.1 This reaction is particularly prevalent in the oceanic crust and along tectonic plate boundaries, but also occurs in specific terrestrial settings.1, 5 Because serpentinization is an ongoing geological process, it has led to claims that white hydrogen is a “renewable” or “infinite” energy source.2 However, this terminology is a point of significant contention. While the process is continuous, the rate of replenishment is a critical unknown. Some sources suggest a remarkably rapid regeneration time of about 10 years, which would support a renewable classification.6 Conversely, institutions like France’s National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) caution that the natural production rate is likely far too slow relative to global energy consumption to be considered renewable on human timescales, making it a depletable, albeit continuously generated, resource.7 Until conclusive data on replenishment rates becomes available, the term “continuously generated” is more accurate and scientifically defensible than “renewable.”

A secondary, yet important, generation process is radiolysis. This occurs when natural radiation emitted by radioactive elements, such as uranium and thorium contained within certain rock formations, splits water molecules (H2​O) into hydrogen and oxygen.1, 2, 5 This process is a key target for exploration, as radiometric surveys that map surface concentrations of these radioactive elements can help identify potential hydrogen-producing source rocks.8 Other contributing, though less dominant, sources include the degassing of deep hydrogen from the Earth’s crust and mantle, the decomposition of organic matter, and various forms of biological activity.1, 7

These unique generation mechanisms mean that exploration for white hydrogen operates under a completely different geological paradigm than the search for oil and gas. While hydrocarbon exploration focuses on sedimentary basins where organic matter has been buried and transformed, hydrogen exploration targets entirely different environments, primarily ancient, iron-rich cratons and tectonic rift zones.1, 2 This has profound implications. Decades of geological data and expertise accumulated by the oil and gas industry are not directly transferable for locating hydrogen reserves. The white hydrogen industry is therefore starting from a near-zero baseline in terms of proven reserve mapping, making exploration risk the single greatest barrier to its growth. This necessitates significant upfront capital for high-risk geological surveys in areas previously considered of little economic interest.5 Key exploration targets include:

• Mid-Ocean Ridges and Ophiolites: Serpentinization is frequent in oceanic crust. Ophiolites—sections of oceanic crust that have been thrust up onto continental landmasses—are prime targets for exploration.1
• Cratons and Rift Systems: Stable continental cratons and large rift systems, such as the Midcontinent Rift System of North America, contain the iron-rich basement rocks conducive to serpentinization and radiolysis.1, 9
• Surface Manifestations: Exploration is also guided by surface indicators. The most notable are “fairy circles,” which are shallow, circular depressions in the soil where hydrogen has been detected seeping to the surface. These structures have been identified in numerous countries, including Brazil, Australia, the United States, and Mali, and serve as potential signposts for underlying hydrogen accumulations.8, 10

The potential scale of this resource is immense, though figures remain highly speculative. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is developing a comprehensive model that hints at global reserves of trillions of metric tons.5 Various reports cite estimates ranging from 5 trillion to 150 trillion metric tons of hydrogen in the Earth’s crust.1, 2 To put this in perspective, current global annual hydrogen production is around 100 million tons.11 However, it is crucial to apply the same discipline to these figures as in the hydrocarbon industry, distinguishing between total resources and economically recoverable reserves. It is widely acknowledged that the vast majority of this geologic hydrogen is likely trapped in inaccessible locations or is too diffuse to be extracted economically with current technology.1, 7 The challenge, therefore, is not the theoretical abundance of the resource, but the practical ability to locate and produce it at a commercial scale.

1.2 The Global Hunt: Exploration, Projects, and Key Players

The modern pursuit of geologic hydrogen was catalyzed by an accidental discovery in 1987 in the village of Bourakébougou, Mali. While drilling a water well, workers unexpectedly struck a gas deposit that was later identified as being over 97% pure hydrogen.3, 10 Since 2012, this single well has been used to power a turbine, providing electricity to the local community.2 For years, this remained a geological curiosity, but it now stands as the world’s only documented, continuously producing natural hydrogen site, serving as a crucial proof-of-concept for the entire industry.5, 7

Spurred by this example and a growing demand for low-carbon energy, the sector has experienced an explosion of interest. The number of companies actively searching for natural hydrogen deposits surged from just 10 in 2020 to over 40 by the end of 2023.9, 12 These firms are deploying a sophisticated suite of geophysical exploration techniques, often adapted from the oil and gas, mining, and geothermal industries, to de-risk the search for this new resource.8 Key methods include:

• Airborne Geophysical Surveys: Technologies such as airborne gravity gradiometry (AGG) and aeromagnetics are proving essential. These surveys can map the architecture of the subsurface basement rock and, crucially, identify the large magnetic anomalies associated with magnetite, a mineral formed during the serpentinization process.8
• Radiometrics: Airborne surveys also measure surface concentrations of potassium, uranium, and thorium. This data helps pinpoint rock formations that are rich in radioactive elements, indicating a higher potential for hydrogen generation via radiolysis.8
• Seismic and Electromagnetic Methods: These techniques are used to characterize deeper subsurface structures, identifying faults that could serve as migration pathways for hydrogen and porous rock formations that could act as temporary reservoirs.8

This exploration boom is concentrated in several global hotspots where the geology is considered favorable:

• United States: The Midcontinent Rift System, an ancient tectonic rift running through states like Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa, has become a focal point of intense exploration activity.3, 9
  • Koloma: A high-profile, venture-backed startup that has emerged as a leader in the space, having raised over $350 million from prominent investors including Bill Gates’s Breakthrough Energy Ventures.2, 3, 5 The company is actively exploring prospects in Arkansas and has received a $900,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) to research “stimulated hydrogen” production.2, 13
  • HyTerra: The first company focused on white hydrogen to list on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), HyTerra is advancing projects in the U.S. Its flagship Nemaha Project in Kansas covers approximately 72,500 acres in a region with historical well data showing gas occurrences of up to 92% hydrogen. The company commenced its maiden exploration drilling program in 2024.14
• France: A major catalyst for European interest was the 2023 announcement of a massive potential discovery in France’s Lorraine basin. Initial estimates suggest the deposit could hold between 46 million and 260 million metric tons of white hydrogen, a volume equivalent to several years of current global production.1, 11 Française De l’Énergie, a local energy company, has stated its ambition to begin extracting hydrogen from this region by 2027 or 2028.1
• Australia: The geology of South Australia is considered highly prospective. Gold Hydrogen Ltd holds an exploration license for its Ramsay Project on the Yorke Peninsula and Kangaroo Island. During drilling in late 2023 and early 2024, the company found gas with high concentrations of both hydrogen (up to 86%) and helium (up to 17.5%).8, 12

The frequent co-occurrence of helium with natural hydrogen is a critical factor shaping the industry’s economics. Helium is a high-value, non-renewable industrial gas with a constrained global supply, commanding market prices between €30 and €70 per kilogram.6 For an exploration project with a projected hydrogen production cost of under $1/kg, the revenue stream from co-produced helium could be substantial, potentially subsidizing or even exceeding the revenue from hydrogen itself. This symbiotic relationship dramatically improves project economics and de-risks the high upfront investment in exploration, transforming a pure energy play into a more lucrative, diversified industrial gas venture.

Recognizing the high risk associated with pure exploration, a parallel strategy of “stimulated hydrogen” is gaining traction. This approach, actively funded by programs like ARPA-E, aims to engineer the hydrogen generation process in situ.13 Rather than searching for pre-existing, trapped accumulations, this method involves identifying favorable geological formations—such as iron-rich rock—and then injecting water or other fluids to deliberately trigger or accelerate the serpentinization reaction.2 This represents a crucial strategic pivot for the industry. It shifts the business model from high-risk exploration (finding a finite resource) to a more predictable and controllable manufacturing process (creating the resource where the geology is known to be suitable). By mitigating the primary hurdle of discovery risk, stimulated hydrogen could offer a more scalable and bankable path to commercialization, transforming the venture from a wildcatting operation into a subsurface chemical engineering project. The U.S. DOE’s $20 million investment in 2024 across 16 projects at universities, national labs, and private companies is a clear signal of the strategic importance of this approach.3, 13

1.3 From Wellhead to Market: Extraction, Economics, and Environmental Scrutiny

Once a promising deposit is located, the focus shifts to extraction, a process that borrows heavily from conventional drilling but carries its own unique set of challenges and controversies. While engineers suggest that extraction can be straightforward, as the light and mobile hydrogen gas often seeps naturally to the surface once a pathway is drilled, the need for well stimulation techniques remains a contentious issue.10 Some sources state that hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking”—the process of injecting a high-pressure mixture of water, sand, and chemicals to release trapped gas—is a primary method for white hydrogen extraction.11, 15 Others maintain that no fracking is required.10 The reality likely lies in between; high-quality, permeable reservoirs may flow freely, while poorer-quality or deeper deposits, such as those in buried coal seams, may require fracking or other forms of well stimulation to achieve commercial flow rates.7 This ambiguity has significant environmental implications and will be a key factor in public acceptance and regulatory oversight.

The primary allure of white hydrogen lies in its projected production cost, which stands to dramatically undercut all other forms of hydrogen. Industry estimates consistently place the cost of extracting natural hydrogen in the range of $0.50 to $1.00 per kilogram.6, 12 This positions it as a formidable competitor to both established and emerging hydrogen production methods, as detailed in Table 1.

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Hydrogen Production Pathways

In the United States, the economics are further bolstered by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which offers a Production Tax Credit (PTC) of up to $3.00/kg for clean hydrogen produced with a life-cycle carbon intensity below 0.45 kg CO2e/kg H2.12, 20 A white hydrogen project with high purity and low methane contamination could qualify for this highest tier of subsidy, potentially making it not just competitive but exceptionally profitable.

However, the “clean” designation of white hydrogen is not guaranteed and requires rigorous life-cycle assessment (LCA). The single most important factor determining its carbon intensity is the purity of the extracted gas, specifically the concentration of co-produced methane (CH4​), a potent greenhouse gas.7, 12 Analysis shows that a deposit with 85% hydrogen and minimal methane could achieve a very low carbon intensity of around 0.4 kg CO2e/kg H2, qualifying it for the IRA tax credit.12 Conversely, a deposit with 75% hydrogen and 22% methane would see its carbon intensity rise to 1.5 kg CO2e/kg H2, a level that would fail to meet stricter clean hydrogen standards.7, 12 The discovery in Lorraine, France, where initial samples showed only 20% hydrogen mixed with other gases, underscores the critical challenge of finding high-purity reserves.7, 11

Beyond co-produced gases, fugitive emissions of hydrogen itself are an environmental concern. While hydrogen is not a direct greenhouse gas, it acts as an indirect one in the atmosphere by reacting with hydroxyl radicals (OH), which in turn extends the atmospheric lifetime of methane.10, 21 Therefore, minimizing leakage during production, storage, and transportation is essential to preserve its climate benefits.21 Recognizing these complexities, the U.S. Department of Energy has tasked Argonne National Laboratory with developing a formal LCA methodology for geologic hydrogen to be integrated into its GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies) model, which will provide a standardized framework for evaluating its true environmental footprint.13, 22

Finally, even if clean, low-cost hydrogen can be extracted, significant logistical hurdles remain. The Mali well, the industry’s only long-term case study, produces at a very low flow rate of 5 to 50 tonnes per year—less than a tenth of the energy output of a single medium-sized wind turbine.7 Commercial viability will demand flow rates many orders of magnitude higher. Furthermore, hydrogen is notoriously difficult and expensive to transport over long distances. Its low volumetric energy density requires either high-pressure compression or cryogenic liquefaction to -253°C, both of which are energy-intensive and costly processes.11, 21 This “tyranny of transport” means that for a white hydrogen project to be economically viable, its wellhead must be located in close proximity to an industrial demand center, obviating the need for long-haul pipelines or shipping.2, 7

1.4 Analyst’s Assessment: Hype vs. Reality in the White Hydrogen Landscape

The geologic hydrogen sector is defined by a profound dichotomy between its theoretical potential and its current, unproven reality. On one hand, the prospect of tapping into trillions of tons of continuously generated, low-carbon hydrogen at a production cost below $1/kg is undeniably revolutionary.1, 6 It offers a vision of energy that is not only clean but also fundamentally cheaper than both fossil fuels and other low-carbon alternatives. This potential has rightly generated significant investor excitement and media attention, fueling the “white gold” rush.

On the other hand, the industry today stands on a fragile foundation of evidence. There is only one operational project in the world, and it is of minuscule scale.7 Every other project remains in the early, high-risk exploration phase. There are no proven commercial reserves, no validated flow rates at scale, and significant uncertainty regarding resource purity, extraction methods, and replenishment rates. The industry is at an inflection point where hype must be substantiated by hard data from the field.

The ultimate success of white hydrogen is not a foregone conclusion; it hinges on the concurrent resolution of several critical challenges that will determine whether it becomes a cornerstone of the energy transition or remains a niche curiosity:

1. Exploration Success and Resource Quality: The foremost challenge is geological. Companies must successfully discover large, concentrated, and high-pressure reservoirs. Crucially, these reservoirs must contain high-purity hydrogen (>80% H2) with minimal methane contamination to ensure a low carbon intensity and favorable economics.
2. Proximity to Market: Due to the prohibitive economics of long-distance hydrogen transport, viable discoveries must be geographically co-located with industrial demand centers, such as chemical plants, steel mills, or fertilizer producers.2, 7 A massive, pure deposit in a remote location may be commercially worthless.
3. Scalable and Sustainable Extraction: Companies must demonstrate the ability to achieve high and sustained flow rates from these reservoirs. This must be done in an environmentally acceptable manner, ideally without resorting to widespread hydraulic fracturing, which could trigger public and regulatory opposition.7
4. Enabling Regulatory Frameworks: Governments must establish clear and supportive regulatory frameworks that address ownership rights, licensing for exploration and production, and environmental and safety standards. This legal clarity is essential to attract the large-scale investment needed to move from exploration to development.4, 18

From a strategic perspective, white hydrogen is currently a high-risk, high-reward venture. It is best suited for specialized exploration firms and venture capital funds with a deep understanding of subsurface geology and a high tolerance for risk.5, 23 It is far too early-stage and unproven to be considered a reliable contributor to meeting 2030 or even 2040 decarbonization targets.7 For investors, policymakers, and industry observers, the single most important metric to monitor in the coming years will be the announcement of the first proven commercial reserves, validated by a successful flow test from an exploration well. Such an announcement would be the true inflection point, signaling the transition of white hydrogen from a promising geological concept to a tangible economic asset.

Part II: Beyond the Earth’s Crust: The Next Wave of Generation Technologies

While geologic hydrogen captures headlines with its disruptive potential, a diverse portfolio of other advanced energy technologies is steadily progressing beyond the laboratory. These innovations, though not yet at the mainstream scale of solar and wind, represent the next wave of the energy transition, each targeting specific challenges and market segments. This section provides a comparative analysis of three of the most significant emerging fields: advanced biofuels, which offer a pragmatic path to decarbonizing existing infrastructure; space-based solar power, a high-risk, high-reward frontier driven by geopolitical ambition; and nuclear fusion, where a surge in private investment is accelerating the race to commercialize the power of the stars. Together, they illustrate the multifaceted nature of the future energy landscape, where no single solution will dominate, but a suite of specialized technologies will be required to achieve deep decarbonization.

2.1 Advanced Biofuels and the Circular Carbon Economy

The biofuel sector is undergoing a critical evolution, moving decisively beyond the first-generation, food-versus-fuel controversies. The contemporary focus is squarely on advanced biofuels, which are produced from non-food biomass and waste streams. This includes lignocellulosic feedstocks like agricultural residues (e.g., corn stover), forestry by-products, and municipal solid waste, as well as purpose-grown energy crops and algae.24, 25 This shift addresses key sustainability concerns and unlocks a much larger and more diverse feedstock base.

Innovation is proceeding along several key technological pathways, each at a different stage of maturity:

• Hydrotreatment (HVO/HEFA): This is currently the most mature and commercially deployed advanced biofuel technology. The process uses hydrogen to treat vegetable oils, waste oils, and animal fats to produce Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO), also known as renewable diesel, and Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA), a primary form of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF). The majority of operational advanced biofuel facilities today utilize this pathway.25
• Gasification and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Synthesis: This is a thermochemical route that converts solid biomass into a synthesis gas (syngas), which is then catalytically converted into liquid fuels like renewable diesel and jet fuel. Commercial-scale projects using this technology are advancing in the United States, Europe, and Japan, utilizing a wide range of feedstocks from forestry residues to municipal solid waste.25
• Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL): These processes use heat to break down biomass into a liquid intermediate known as bio-oil or biocrude. While this pathway is less mature than hydrotreatment, its primary advantage lies in the potential for its bio-oil product to be “co-processed” alongside fossil crude in existing petroleum refineries.25
• Cellulosic Ethanol: This biochemical pathway uses enzymes and microorganisms to ferment the sugars found in the non-edible, fibrous parts of plants. While its commercialization has been slower than anticipated due to technical challenges, there is growing production capacity, particularly in emerging economies like Brazil.24, 25

The strategic importance of advanced biofuels lies in their ability to decarbonize sectors where direct electrification is technologically challenging or economically unfeasible. The primary target market is transportation, particularly long-distance modes of travel.25 Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is the most prominent driver, with the global aviation industry committed to reducing its carbon intensity and facing few other viable low-carbon options. Over 50 plants listed in the IEA Bioenergy’s global database are capable of producing SAF.25, 26 Maritime shipping and heavy-duty road transport are also key future markets that can benefit from these liquid “drop-in” fuels, which are compatible with existing engines and distribution infrastructure.26, 27

A critical trend accelerating the deployment of these fuels is the strategy of co-processing. Rather than building entirely new, capital-intensive biofuel refineries from the ground up, this approach involves feeding bio-based intermediates—such as bio-oils from pyrolysis or lipids—directly into existing petroleum refineries to be processed alongside conventional crude oil.25 This is not merely a technical process but a profound business strategy for the incumbent energy industry. It allows oil and gas majors to leverage their vast, multi-billion-dollar, and often depreciated refinery assets to produce lower-carbon fuels with minimal new capital expenditure. This pragmatic approach provides a bridge for the traditional energy sector to participate in the energy transition, accelerating the market entry of advanced biofuels and scaling production much faster than would be possible with greenfield projects alone.

This progress is underpinned by robust research and development efforts at institutions like the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and multi-institution consortia such as the Joint BioEnergy Institute (JBEI) and the Agile BioFoundry.24, 28 These centers are at the forefront of innovation, employing cutting-edge tools from synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, and metabolic engineering to develop more efficient microbes and catalysts, optimize conversion processes, and ultimately drive down the cost of advanced biofuel production.28

2.2 Space-Based Solar Power: A New Frontier or Enduring Fiction?

At the most ambitious edge of renewable energy exploration lies the concept of Space-Based Solar Power (SBSP). The premise is compelling: placing massive solar arrays in orbit, where they can harvest sunlight 24/7, unfiltered by the Earth’s atmosphere, and then beam that energy wirelessly to receiving stations (rectennas) on the ground.29, 30 Proponents suggest that solar panels in space could be up to ten times more efficient at energy collection than their terrestrial counterparts, offering a source of constant, dispatchable clean power.29

Despite its conceptual elegance, SBSP faces immense and persistent challenges that have, for decades, confined it to the realm of science fiction. The primary barriers are:

• Prohibitive Cost and Scale: The sheer mass and size of the proposed systems are staggering. A NASA study analyzing reference designs for a 2-gigawatt SBSP system found it would require a solar panel area over 3,000 times larger than that of the International Space Station.30 The cost of launching, assembling, and maintaining such a megastructure in geostationary orbit is, with current technology, astronomical and makes it uncompetitive with terrestrial energy sources.30
• Wireless Transmission Inefficiency: The core technical hurdle is the efficiency of wirelessly transmitting power over tens of thousands of kilometers. A 2023 estimate from a Caltech expert suggested that only 5-12% of the energy transmitted from a satellite would successfully reach the ground rectenna, making the end-to-end system significantly less efficient than an Earth-based solar farm.29 Overcoming this loss is the central challenge for the technology’s viability.
• Safety and Regulatory Hurdles: The prospect of beaming gigawatts of microwave or laser power through the atmosphere raises significant safety, environmental, and regulatory questions. Ensuring the beam remains locked on its target and developing safeguards against accidental exposure or misuse are paramount. Gaining public acceptance and establishing international regulatory frameworks for such a system would be a monumental undertaking.29

Despite these formidable obstacles, interest in SBSP has been reignited in recent years, driven less by immediate energy economics and more by long-term strategic and geopolitical considerations. A new space race appears to be emerging:

• China: The Chinese government has announced ambitious plans for a massive SBSP project, with senior scientists likening it to building “another Three Gorges Dam above the Earth.” Their stated goal is to have an operational system transmitting power by 2035, positioning China as a potential first-mover in this domain.29
• United Kingdom: The British government is actively funding research and development, commissioning feasibility studies that suggest SBSP could supply up to a quarter of the UK’s electricity demand by 2050. This initiative aims to secure a strategic edge for the UK in a potential multi-billion-pound future industry.29
• United States: While government-led efforts are more nascent, a number of private startups, such as Aetherflux and Overview Energy, are exploring novel SBSP concepts, often focusing on laser-based power transmission. Academic hubs like Caltech’s Space Solar Power Project and awards from the U.S. Space Force are helping to advance the underlying technologies.29

This flurry of activity suggests that SBSP should be analyzed not merely as an energy project, but as a 21st-century geopolitical catalyst. The nation that first develops and deploys a functional SBSP system would gain an unparalleled strategic advantage. This includes not only energy independence but also the ability to beam power to military assets, disaster-stricken areas, or allied nations, effectively wielding energy as a tool of global influence. Therefore, the primary driver of government investment in SBSP in the coming years will likely be the pursuit of national security, technological supremacy, and leadership in the burgeoning cislunar economy, with climate goals serving as a secondary justification. For now, SBSP remains a very long-term, high-risk endeavor, whose feasibility is contingent on revolutionary breakthroughs in low-cost space launch (e.g., SpaceX’s Starship) and wireless power transmission efficiency.

2.3 Nuclear Fusion: The Private Sector Race to Commercialize a Star

For over 60 years, the quest to harness nuclear fusion—the process that powers the sun—has been the holy grail of clean energy research. The promise is near-limitless, carbon-free energy from abundant fuel sources like deuterium and lithium. For most of its history, this pursuit has been dominated by massive, government-funded, multinational projects.

The flagship of this public effort is the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), currently under construction in southern France. As a global scientific partnership, ITER’s primary goal is to demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility of fusion at scale. It is designed to be the first fusion device to produce a “burning plasma,” generating 500 MW of thermal power from a 50 MW input of heating power—an energy gain factor (Q) of 10.31, 32, 33 However, the project has been plagued by significant delays and massive cost overruns. The official budget has swelled to over €20 billion, and the most recent 2024 schedule has pushed the start of initial deuterium-deuterium operations to 2035, with full, power-producing deuterium-tritium experiments not expected until 2039 at the earliest.31, 34, 35 ITER will not generate electricity; it is purely an experimental device.

While ITER proceeds at a deliberate, bureaucratic pace, a paradigm shift is occurring in the private sector. A dynamic and well-funded ecosystem of private fusion companies has emerged, transforming the field from a purely academic pursuit into a fast-paced industrial movement. Over 50 companies are now active globally, having collectively raised over $9 billion in private investment.36, 37 This disruption has been catalyzed by decades of progress in plasma physics, growing demand for firm, 24/7 clean power, and, most importantly, the maturation of key enabling technologies, particularly high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets.37

These private ventures are pursuing a diverse range of technological approaches, many of which aim to be smaller, faster to build, and more economically viable than the massive scale of ITER. The leading players are making tangible progress, as detailed in Table 2.

Table 2: Profile of Leading Private Nuclear Fusion Companies

This private fusion race is not only about building reactors; it is also fostering a robust “picks-and-shovels” supply chain. Companies specializing in critical components like HTS wires (e.g., Bruker, Furukawa Electric), high-power lasers (e.g., Thales), and specialized vacuum systems (e.g., Pfeiffer Vacuum) are securing contracts and offering investors a lower-risk way to gain exposure to the burgeoning fusion economy.40

A crucial development that redefines the commercialization pathway for fusion is the emergence of Big Tech as the first anchor customers. The landmark Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) signed by Helion with Microsoft and CFS with Google are game-changers.39, 40 The exponential growth of artificial intelligence and cloud computing is creating a voracious and rapidly expanding demand for clean, reliable, 24/7 baseload power that intermittent renewables like solar and wind cannot satisfy without massive-scale energy storage.3 By signing these offtake agreements, technology giants are providing the revenue certainty that private fusion companies need to secure the immense financing required to build their first-of-a-kind commercial power plants. This indicates that the initial market for fusion is not to compete with cheap, grid-scale solar in the public utility market. Instead, its first beachhead will be as a premium, firm power product sold directly to high-value industrial customers who are willing to pay for carbon-free reliability. This shifts the entire economic model for fusion’s entry into the market from a low-margin commodity to a high-value business-to-business energy service.

Part III: The Legacy of Tesla: The Modern Pursuit of Wireless Power

No discussion of emerging energy technologies is complete without addressing the enduring legacy of Nikola Tesla and his most famous, yet uncommercialized, ambition: the wireless transmission of power. While Tesla’s grandest vision remains unrealized, the fundamental concepts he pioneered have been resurrected and refined by a new generation of innovators. However, the modern pursuit of wireless power is not a monolithic effort to fulfill Tesla’s dream. Instead, it has fractured into distinct technological paradigms, each tailored to specific applications and governed by the immutable laws of physics that dictate a fundamental trade-off between power, distance, and efficiency. This section deconstructs the concept of “wireless power,” analyzing the competing approaches of contemporary players and assessing their true commercial viability.

3.1 From Wardenclyffe to the Wireless World: The Evolution of Power Transfer

Nikola Tesla’s most ambitious project was the “World Wireless System,” a revolutionary concept for the global transmission of not only information but also free, unlimited electrical energy.41, 42 His laboratory and massive transmission tower at Wardenclyffe, Long Island (1901-1906), were intended to be the central hub of this global network.41 Tesla’s scientific approach was based on using the Earth itself and its ionosphere as a giant electrical conductor. He believed he could transmit power by inducing electrical oscillations with his high-voltage resonant transformers, known as Tesla Coils, which could then be picked up by receivers anywhere on the planet.42, 43, 44

The project ultimately failed for a combination of financial and technical reasons. Tesla’s primary financial backer, the banker J. Pierpont Morgan, withdrew his support when he realized there was no clear business model for profiting from an energy source that Tesla intended to be free.41, 42 Furthermore, the technical challenge of broadcasting power omnidirectionally over long distances is plagued by extreme inefficiency; the power of a signal degrades rapidly with distance, a physical limitation that Tesla’s experiments could not overcome for practical energy transfer.45, 46

After nearly a century of dormancy, the concept of wireless power transfer (WPT) was revived in the early 2000s, but with a crucial strategic pivot.47 Modern innovators abandoned Tesla’s idea of global broadcasting and instead focused on developing highly targeted, application-specific power transfer systems. Today, “wireless power” is not a single technology but a spectrum of distinct approaches, each optimized for a different combination of range, power level, and use case.48, 49

3.2 Contemporary Players and Competing Paradigms

The modern wireless power landscape can be segmented into three primary technological paradigms, each with its own set of leading companies and target markets.

• Far-Field, High-Power Beaming (Microwave/Laser): This approach is the clearest technological successor to the high-power, long-distance aspect of Tesla’s vision. The leading company in this space is EMROD, a New Zealand-based firm.
  • Technology: EMROD’s system uses microwave energy to transmit large amounts of power—from kilowatts to potentially megawatts—over long distances (kilometers).50, 51 Unlike Tesla’s broadcast method, EMROD’s technology converts electricity into a highly focused, collimated beam that is sent from a transmitting antenna to a specific receiving antenna (a rectenna), functioning like a “virtual wire”.46, 52, 53 The company claims a very high beam collection efficiency of over 97% and uses a series of passive relays to extend the transmission range or navigate around obstacles.54, 55 Safety is managed by a system that can instantly shut down the beam if an object, such as a bird or drone, is about to cross its path.54
  • Applications: The primary target markets are grid-level infrastructure applications where physical wires are impractical or prohibitively expensive. This includes replacing copper lines in challenging terrain, connecting remote communities or industrial sites (like mines), and providing rapid power for disaster relief.50, 51 EMROD’s ultimate long-term goal is to provide the transmission backbone for space-based solar power via a “Worldwide Energy Matrix”.50, 52, 56 The company is actively conducting tests and has formed partnerships with utility Powerco, Airbus, and the European Space Agency.48, 50, 51
• Far-Field, Low-Power, Non-Line-of-Sight (RF): This paradigm focuses on delivering small amounts of power (milliwatts to a few watts) to numerous electronic devices at a distance within an indoor environment, such as a room or warehouse. The pioneer in this segment is Ossia, with its Cota technology.
  • Technology: Cota operates in the 2.4 GHz radio frequency band, the same as Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.45, 57 Its patented system works via a two-way communication process. A tiny receiver chip embedded in a device sends out a low-power beacon signal. The Cota transmitter, which can be embedded in a ceiling tile or other fixture, detects this beacon. The transmitter’s phased-array antenna then sends power back to the device along the exact same paths the beacon signal traveled, including reflections off walls and objects.58, 59 This process, which repeats 100 times per second, allows the system to power multiple devices in motion and, crucially, to inherently avoid sending power through people or pets, as they do not reflect the beacon signal in the same way as inanimate objects.59, 60
  • Applications: Cota is not designed to charge high-power devices like laptops or replace wall outlets. Its target market is the vast and growing ecosystem of low-power Internet of Things (IoT) devices. This includes powering electronic shelf labels in retail, asset-tracking sensors in logistics, and various smart home or smart building devices where the cost and labor of regularly replacing batteries is a significant operational burden.58, 61 The company’s business model is based on technology licensing and it has received regulatory approvals from the FCC in the U.S. and in Europe for operation without distance limitations.62, 63, 64
• Near-Field, Mid-Power (Resonant Inductive Coupling): This technology builds upon the simple inductive coupling used in Qi charging pads but enhances it to allow for power transfer over greater distances (from centimeters up to a meter) and with more spatial freedom. The leading commercial entity is WiTricity, an MIT spinout that commercialized a technology known as High Resonance Wireless Power Transfer (HRWPT).47
  • Technology: HRWPT uses magnetic resonance to efficiently transfer power between two specially tuned coils, even if they are not perfectly aligned. This allows for a more convenient and flexible user experience than traditional inductive charging, which requires precise placement.
  • Applications: The primary market for WiTricity and resonant coupling is the wireless charging of electric vehicles (EVs). By embedding a charging pad in a garage floor or parking space, an EV can be charged automatically without the need for plugs and cables.47, 48 The technology is also applicable to higher-power consumer electronics and industrial robotics.47

These distinct approaches are summarized in Table 3, which clarifies their trade-offs and market segmentation.

Table 3: Overview of Modern Wireless Power Transfer Technologies

3.3 Analyst’s Assessment: Commercial Viability and Market Segmentation

The modern reality of wireless power is that Tesla’s singular, grand dream has not been realized. Instead, it has been intelligently deconstructed and re-engineered into multiple, commercially viable niche technologies. The fundamental physics of electromagnetic radiation, where power density decreases rapidly with distance, has forced this market segmentation.45, 65 There is no one-size-fits-all solution; the future of wireless power is targeted, not broadcast.

The commercial viability of each paradigm must be assessed within its specific market context:

• EMROD’s Path to Viability: For high-power, long-distance beaming, the key to commercial success is not competing with conventional power lines in established grids, but in identifying applications where the cost of physical infrastructure is prohibitive. The most plausible near-term markets are powering remote industrial sites (e.g., mines, scientific monitoring stations) or providing rapid, transportable power for military operations or disaster relief.51, 66 In these scenarios, the high capital cost of the wireless system can be justified against the even higher cost or impossibility of laying cables. Its long-term vision of supporting space-based solar power remains highly speculative and dependent on the maturation of that separate industry.56 EMROD’s success will depend entirely on demonstrating near-perfect end-to-end efficiency and irrefutable safety for its high-power beams.
• Ossia’s Path to Viability: Cota’s value proposition is not about delivering large amounts of power, but about solving a massive operational pain point: the manual replacement of batteries in billions of low-power IoT devices. For a large retailer with tens of thousands of electronic shelf labels or a logistics company with a fleet of asset trackers, the labor cost and operational disruption of battery management are significant.61 Cota offers a solution where the value is measured in operational efficiency, labor savings, and the ability to enable new, data-rich device functionalities that were previously constrained by battery life.58, 61 The primary challenge for Ossia is not the technology’s function but its overall system efficiency and the business case for the upfront cost of installing the transmitter infrastructure.45, 67

Ultimately, the legacy of Nikola Tesla lives on not as a blueprint for a single world system, but as the inspiration for a diverse ecosystem of wireless technologies. The future is one where power, like data, is delivered through the most appropriate channel for the task at hand. For high-power needs, the wire will remain dominant, but for a growing number of specialized applications—from charging an EV in a garage to powering a sensor deep within a warehouse—the future is indeed wireless.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

The global energy landscape is in a state of dynamic flux, with innovation extending far beyond the mainstream renewables of solar and wind. This report has analyzed three distinct frontiers of this evolution: the nascent “white gold” rush for geologic hydrogen, the next wave of advanced generation technologies including biofuels and nuclear fusion, and the modern re-emergence of Nikola Tesla’s vision for wireless power. The analysis reveals a complex and nuanced picture, where profound long-term potential must be carefully weighed against near-term commercial realities.

A synthesis of the findings highlights several overarching themes that will define the trajectory of these emerging sectors. First is the pivotal role of incumbent industries in facilitating the transition. Both geologic hydrogen and advanced biofuels offer pragmatic pathways for the traditional oil and gas sector to pivot its expertise and leverage its vast infrastructure. The use of established drilling techniques for hydrogen exploration and the co-processing of bio-oils in existing refineries demonstrate that the energy transition will be as much about adaptation and integration as it will be about pure disruption. These strategies provide a lower-capital, faster-to-market route for producing low-carbon molecules, bridging the gap between the fossil-fuel present and a decarbonized future.

Second is the critical importance of high-value niche markets as the initial beachhead for breakthrough technologies. Both nuclear fusion and wireless power transfer illustrate this principle. Rather than attempting to compete immediately with cheap, commoditized grid electricity, they are finding their first commercial footing in specialized applications where their unique attributes command a premium. The landmark power purchase agreements between private fusion companies and technology giants like Microsoft and Google show that the first market for fusion is providing firm, 24/7 clean power to energy-hungry data centers, not the general public. Similarly, the most viable forms of wireless power are not aiming to replace the wall socket, but to solve specific operational pain points, such as eliminating battery replacements in millions of IoT devices or providing unparalleled convenience for EV charging. These niche markets provide the revenue certainty needed to scale production, drive down costs, and eventually address broader markets.

Finally, a recurring theme across all these technologies is the critical need for sober, data-driven analysis to separate profound potential from speculative hype. The theoretical promise of geologic hydrogen—trillions of tons of cheap, clean fuel—is immense, but it is currently supported by minimal proven data. The dream of limitless energy from nuclear fusion or space-based solar power is captivating, but the timelines to commercial reality remain long and uncertain. For stakeholders, the ability to discern between a press release and a proven field result, between a funding round and a functional prototype, is paramount.

Looking ahead, the next three to five years will be a critical period of validation for these emerging frontiers. Several key inflection points will provide the hard data needed to confirm or revise current optimistic projections and should be monitored closely by investors, policymakers, and corporate strategists:

• For Geologic Hydrogen, the most crucial developments will be the results of flow tests from exploration wells drilled by companies like Gold Hydrogen in Australia and HyTerra in the United States. A sustained, high-volume flow of high-purity hydrogen from a single well would be the industry’s first true proof of commercial viability, transforming it from a concept into a bankable resource.
• For Nuclear Fusion, two milestones will be pivotal. The first is the achievement of net energy gain from Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ SPARC demonstrator, expected around 2026, which would validate the commercial promise of compact, high-field tokamaks. The second is the operational start of Helion’s power plant supplying electricity to Microsoft, targeted for 2028, which would mark the first time fusion energy is delivered to a commercial customer.
• For Wireless Power, the key indicators will be the real-world deployment and economic performance of EMROD’s power-beaming technology with its utility partner Powerco, and the market adoption rate of Ossia’s Cota-enabled IoT devices in sectors like retail and logistics.

The successful achievement of these milestones will signal that these technologies are transitioning from the laboratory to the marketplace, ready to play a meaningful role in the next phase of the global energy transition. Until then, they remain on the horizon—a collection of promising, powerful, and potentially world-changing innovations that demand both visionary investment and rigorous scrutiny.

Read more Alternative Energy articles.

Notes

1. Mihajlo Vujasin, “White Hydrogen: Sustainable Energy from Depths of Earth,” Balkan Green Energy News, October 2, 2023, https://balkangreenenergynews.com/white-hydrogen-sustainable-energy-from-depths-of-earth/.
2. “Natural Hydrogen,” Wikipedia, accessed July 20, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_hydrogen.
3. “Everything You Need to Know about Natural or Geologic Hydrogen,” H2 Science Coalition, March 14, 2024, https://h2sciencecoalition.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-natural-or-geologic-hydrogen/.
4. Pace Ventures, “More Difficult than It Seems: The Potential of White Hydrogen,” Medium, May 29, 2024, https://medium.com/@pace-ventures/more-difficult-than-it-seems-the-potential-of-white-hydrogen-e15f2f07f226.
5. Vujasin, “White Hydrogen.”
6. Xcalibur Smart Mapping, “Natural Hydrogen Exploration Projects,” May 2024, https://xcaliburmp.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/natural-hydrogen-projects-2.pdf.
7. “Geologic Hydrogen,” Sandia National Laboratories, accessed July 20, 2024, https://energy.sandia.gov/geologic-hydrogen/.
8. HyTerra, “Natural Hydrogen Exploration & Production,” accessed July 20, 2024, https://hyterra.com/.
9. “U.S. Department of Energy Announces $20 Million to 16 Projects Spearheading Exploration of Geologic Hydrogen,” ARPA-E, February 15, 2024, https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/us-department-energy-announces-20-million-16-projects-spearheading-exploration-geologic-hydrogen.
10. Sandia National Laboratories, “Geologic Hydrogen.”
11. Marcin Frąckiewicz, “Renewable Revolution 2025: Game-Changing Innovations in Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Bioenergy & Hydropower,” TS2.tech, July 10, 2025, https://ts2.tech/en/renewable-revolution-2025-game-changing-innovations-in-solar-wind-geothermal-bioenergy-hydropower/.
12. “What are the alternative source(s) of energy?,” ResearchGate, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-are-the-alternative-source-s-of-energy.
13. “Beyond Solar and Wind Power: New Sources of Renewable Energy,” AdvanceESG, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.advanceesg.org/beyond-solar-and-wind-power-new-sources-of-renewable-energy/.
14. “Can Renewable Energy Expand Beyond Wind and Solar?,” Wärtsilä, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.wartsila.com/insights/article/can-renewable-energy-expand-beyond-wind-and-solar.
15. Infinite AI Stories, “The Future of Clean Energy: What’s Beyond Solar and Wind?,” Medium, October 26, 2023, https://medium.com/@infiniteaistories/the-future-of-clean-energy-whats-beyond-solar-and-wind-9e47d83e94f5.
16. “Top 11 Things You Didn’t Know About Nikola Tesla,” U.S. Department of Energy, July 9, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/articles/top-11-things-you-didnt-know-about-nikola-tesla.
17. “The Inventions of Nikola Tesla,” Tesla Science Center at Wardenclyffe, accessed July 20, 2024, https://teslasciencecenter.org/nikola-tesla-inventions/.
18. “Nikola Tesla’s Lost Technologies: The Visionary Ahead of His Time,” Quantum Zeitgeist, accessed July 20, 2024, https://quantumzeitgeist.com/nikola-teslas-lost-technologies-the-visionary-ahead-of-his-time/.
19. Nikola Tesla’s Forbidden Technology: The Secret of Free Energy, YouTube video, 10:32, posted by “The Why Files,” May 18, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avAAyP0BL2c.
20. The Engine That Could Power the World for Free, YouTube video, 12:45, posted by “Answers with Joe,” June 12, 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogbAAKoKc7U.
21. “Wireless Power: A Journey from Tesla to Technology in Action,” Elektor Magazine, May 20, 2025, https://www.elektormagazine.com/articles/wireless-power-design.
22. “Tesla’s Wireless Power and The Wardenclyffe Tower,” Tesla Science Center at Wardenclyffe, accessed July 20, 2024, https://teslasciencecenter.org/teslas-wireless-power/.
23. “Wireless Power, but Not What Tesla Had in Mind,” Engineering.com, March 21, 2022, https://www.engineering.com/wireless-power-but-not-what-tesla-had-in-mind/.
24. “Tesla’s Vision of Wireless Energy,” Nikola Tesla Museum, Google Arts & Culture, accessed July 20, 2024, https://artsandculture.google.com/story/tesla-s-vision-of-wireless-energy-nikola-tesla-museum/FQXRHCCNJKDMJg?hl=en.
25. M. A. Shwean, “A Review on Tesla’s ‘Radiant Energy’ and the Future of Wireless Power Transmission,” Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications 4, no. 5 (2012): 191-199, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=29663.
26. “NREL’s Advanced Biofuels Research (Text Version),” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.nrel.gov/news/video/nrels-advanced-biofuels-research-text.
27. Advanced Biofuels Association, “The leading voice of energy innovators,” accessed July 20, 2024, https://advancedbiofuelsassociation.com/.
28. “R&D Focus,” Advanced Biofuels USA, accessed July 20, 2024, https://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rd-focus/.
29. IEA Bioenergy Task 39, “Development and Deployment of Advanced Biofuel Demonstration Facilities,” December 2024, https://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/IEA-Report-T39-T4-Development-and-Deployment-of-advanced-biofuel-demonstration-facilities-2024.pdf.
30. “Research Pillars,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.lbl.gov/research/bioenergy-biofuels/.
31. “Is Space-Based Solar Power the Next Big Thing in Space?,” Orbital Today, July 2, 2025, https://orbitaltoday.com/2025/07/02/is-space-based-solar-power-the-next-big-thing-in-space/.
32. NASA Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy, “Space-Based Solar Power,” January 8, 2024, https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/otps-sbsp-report-final-tagged-approved-1-8-24-tagged-v2.pdf.
33. MAX Power Mining Corp, “Natural Hydrogen,” accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.maxpowermining.com/naturalhydrogen/.
34. HyTerra, “Natural Hydrogen Exploration & Production.”
35. Natural Hydrogen Ventures, “We are uniquely positioned to seize the burgeoning investment opportunities presented by Natural Hydrogen,” accessed July 20, 2024, https://nhventures.dk/.
36. “White Hydrogen: A Promising Alternative to Grey and Green Hydrogen?,” Alcimed, September 12, 2023, https://www.alcimed.com/en/insights/white-hydrogen/.
37. “White Hydrogen: Hype or Hope?,” Lux Research, August 24, 2023, https://luxresearchinc.com/blog/white-hydrogen-hype-or-hope/.
38. Richard Hood, “White hydrogen: 5 critical questions answered,” World Economic Forum, August 29, 2024, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/08/white-hydrogen-5-critical-questions-answered/.
39. “The ‘white’ gold rush and the pursuit of natural hydrogen,” PESA, April 18, 2024, https://pesa.com.au/the-white-gold-rush-and-the-pursuit-of-natural-hydrogen/.
40. “R&D GREET Hydrogen Fact Sheet,” U.S. Department of Energy, January 2025, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2025-01/rd-greet-hydrogen-fact-sheet_january-2025.pdf.
41. S. T. T. Le, et al., “Life cycle assessment of green, blue, grey and turquoise hydrogen production,” Green Chemistry 26, (2024): D3GC02410E, https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2024/gc/d3gc02410e.
42. Amgad Elgowainy, et al., “Life-cycle analysis of geologic, renewable, and conventional hydrogen production pathways in the United States,” Frontiers in Energy Research 12 (2024), https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/energy-research/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1473383/full.
43. “Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Hydrogen Production and Delivery Pathways,” U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information, October 31, 2024, https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/2468741.
44. “Emerging Energy Technologies,” National Caucus of Environmental Legislators, accessed July 20, 2024, http://www.ncelenviro.org/issue/emerging-energy-technologies/.
45. “The Future of Renewable Energy Technology: Innovation Will Keep Renewables in the Resource Mix,” Avisen Legal, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.avisenlegal.com/the-future-of-renewable-energy-technology-innovation-will-keep-renewables-in-the-resource-mix/.
46. “Top 10 Renewable Energy Trends in 2025,” Startus Insights, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.startus-insights.com/innovators-guide/top-10-renewable-energy-trends-2022/.
47. National Caucus of Environmental Legislators, “Emerging Energy Technologies.”
48. “ITER,” Wikipedia, accessed July 20, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER.
49. Wikipedia, “ITER.”
50. “U.S. Participation in the ITER Project,” Congressional Research Service, July 15, 2024, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48362.
51. “ITER,” Fusion for Energy, accessed July 20, 2024, https://fusionforenergy.europa.eu/iter/.
52. “ITER’s proposed new timeline – initial phase of operations in 2035,” World Nuclear News, June 20, 2024, https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/iter-s-proposed-new-timeline-initial-phase-of-oper.
53. Tesla Science Center, “Tesla’s Wireless Power.”
54. “Wireless Power Transmission: The Future of Energy Transfer,” International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations 5, no. 3 (March 2025), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389549146_Wireless_Power_Transmission_The_Future_of_Energy_Transfer.
55. “A Wireless World is a Better World,” Illumin, University of Southern California, October 21, 2013, https://illumin.usc.edu/a-wireless-world-is-a-better-world/.
56. D. S. Ricketts, et al., “Wireless power transfer: A review of recent developments,” Proceedings of the IEEE 110, no. 8 (2022): 1140-1158, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9371050/.
57. “Wireless Power Transfer,” Wikipedia, accessed July 20, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transfer.
58. “EMROD: Reimagining the movement of energy,” Callaghan Innovation, January 16, 2025, https://www.callaghaninnovation.govt.nz/stories/emrod-reimagining-the-movement-of-energy/.
59. EMROD, “Power, anywhere,” accessed July 20, 2024, https://emrod.energy/.
60. “How It Works,” EMROD, accessed July 20, 2024, https://emrod.energy/technology/.
61. “How EMROD’s Wireless Power Transfer System Works,” EMROD Blog, October 2023, https://emrod.energy/blog/how-emrods-wireless-power-transfer-system-works/.
62. “A Space-Based Wireless Power Beaming Architecture for Renewable Energy Transition,” EMROD Blog, August 24, 2023, https://emrod.energy/blog/space-based-wireless-power-beaming-architecture-for-renewable-energy-transition/.
63. Ossia, “Pushing the Boundaries of Wireless Power,” accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.ossia.com/.
64. “How Cota Works,” Ossia, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.ossia.com/cota.
65. “About,” Ossia, accessed July 20, 2024, https://www.ossia.com/about.
66. “Cota (power),” Wikipedia, accessed July 20, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cota_(power.
67. “Ossia Unveils Wirelessly Powered Cota Universal Base and Dev Kit at CES 2023,” Robotics247, January 18, 2023, https://www.ossia.com/news/ossia-unveils-wirelessly-powered-cota-universal-base-and-dev-kit-at-ces-2023.

Bibliography

Advanced Biofuels Association. “The leading voice of energy innovators.” Accessed July 20, 2024. https://advancedbiofuelsassociation.com/.

Advanced Biofuels USA. “R&D Focus.” Accessed July 20, 2024. https://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/rd-focus/.

Alcimed. “White Hydrogen: A Promising Alternative to Grey and Green Hydrogen?.” September 12, 2023. https://www.alcimed.com/en/insights/white-hydrogen/.

ARPA-E. “U.S. Department of Energy Announces $20 Million to 16 Projects Spearheading Exploration of Geologic Hydrogen.” February 15, 2024. https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/us-department-energy-announces-20-million-16-projects-spearheading-exploration-geologic-hydrogen.

Avisen Legal. “The Future of Renewable Energy Technology: Innovation Will Keep Renewables in the Resource Mix.” Accessed July 20, 2024. https://www.avisenlegal.com/